I'm not sure if I understand a question properly though, U+E059 should appears on the output of fc-query when available: 00e0: 00000000 00000000 02000000 .... details: 0xe059 >> 8 = 0xe0 0xe059 & 0xff / 32 = 2 (+1 column) 0xe059 & 0x1f = 25 (bit) It's the position for U+E059. On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Does anyone know who might answer this question please? > Another list perhaps? > > TIA Dave > > On 15 January 2012 10:00, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I have an otf font, for which fc-query gives me >> (aft converting to python format) >> font=[ >> ["0000", "00000000","ffffffff","ffffffff","7fffffff","00000000","ffffdffe","ffffffff","ffffffff"], >> ["0001", "ffffffff","feffffff","ffffffff","ffffffff","00040000","00818003","00000000","fc300000"], >> ["0002", "03000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00040000","01850000","3f0000c0","00000008"], >> ["0003", "00040200","00000008","00000000","44300000","ffffd7f0","fffffffb","44637fff","00000001"], >> ["0004", "00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","000c0000","000000c0"], >> ["001e", "00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","0000003f","ffffffff","ffffffff","03ffffff"], >> ["001f", "3f3fffff","ffffffff","aaff3f3f","3fffffff","ffffffff","ffdfffff","efcfffdf","7fdcffff"], >> ["0020", "7fff0bf4","560d0067","00000010","fff10000","00007fff","0000109e","00000000","00000000"], >> ["0021", "00480020","00004044","fff80000","00000000","00200000","00000100","00000000","00000000"], >> ["0022", "44068044","00000f80","00000120","00000033","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000"], >> ["0023", "00010000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000"], >> ["0025", "00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000c02","00008400","00000040"], >> ["00e0", "00000000","00000000","00000070","00000800","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000"], >> xxxx >> ["00f5", "07fdffff","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000"], >> ["00f6", "00000000","fe000000","7fe30007","ffffe7fe","ffffffff","000c3fff","3001ce08","ffffff15"], >> ["00f7", "00000000","83ff0052","00000000","07ffffff","00000000","81108102","00000000","ff7fffff"], >> ["00fb", "0000001f","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000"], >> ["00ff", "00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","10000000"]] >> >> Am I understanding this right please? >> I'm trying to generate a glyph for all those present. >> >> My formatter says no such character where (I think) this map says there is one. >> E.g. E059 >> Row e0 >> Group 3 (e040-e05f) >> character 6 (numbering 0..7) >> which is the 7. >> On which basis (my understanding) >> EO58 - >> EO59 present >> EO5A present >> EO5B present >> >> Am I interpreting this correctly please? >> >> TIA >> >> >> -- >> Dave Pawson >> XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. >> Docbook FAQ. >> http://www.dpawson.co.uk > > > > -- > Dave Pawson > XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. > Docbook FAQ. > http://www.dpawson.co.uk > _______________________________________________ > Fontconfig mailing list > Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig -- Akira TAGOH _______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
