On 17 January 2012 14:57, Akira TAGOH <akira@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm not sure if I understand a question properly though, U+E059 should > appears on the output of fc-query when available: > > 00e0: 00000000 00000000 02000000 .... > > details: > 0xe059 >> 8 = 0xe0 > 0xe059 & 0xff / 32 = 2 (+1 column) > 0xe059 & 0x1f = 25 (bit) > > It's the position for U+E059. Yes, I agree. I've written more code to test it. Yet Fontforge shows no glyph there, my xsl-fo formatter reports it missing so I must assume it is not there? In which case should I be reporting a bug? Or is there some 'gotcha' which says there is a glyph there but only if ..... So my question now is, are the bit positions in the matrix dependent on any other conditions (assuming I am interpreting the matrix correctly) regards > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Does anyone know who might answer this question please? >> Another list perhaps? >> >> TIA Dave >> >> On 15 January 2012 10:00, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> I have an otf font, for which fc-query gives me >>> (aft converting to python format) >>> font=[ >>> ["0000", "00000000","ffffffff","ffffffff","7fffffff","00000000","ffffdffe","ffffffff","ffffffff"], >>> ["0001", "ffffffff","feffffff","ffffffff","ffffffff","00040000","00818003","00000000","fc300000"], >>> ["0002", "03000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00040000","01850000","3f0000c0","00000008"], >>> ["0003", "00040200","00000008","00000000","44300000","ffffd7f0","fffffffb","44637fff","00000001"], >>> ["0004", "00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","000c0000","000000c0"], >>> ["001e", "00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","0000003f","ffffffff","ffffffff","03ffffff"], >>> ["001f", "3f3fffff","ffffffff","aaff3f3f","3fffffff","ffffffff","ffdfffff","efcfffdf","7fdcffff"], >>> ["0020", "7fff0bf4","560d0067","00000010","fff10000","00007fff","0000109e","00000000","00000000"], >>> ["0021", "00480020","00004044","fff80000","00000000","00200000","00000100","00000000","00000000"], >>> ["0022", "44068044","00000f80","00000120","00000033","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000"], >>> ["0023", "00010000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000"], >>> ["0025", "00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000c02","00008400","00000040"], >>> ["00e0", "00000000","00000000","00000070","00000800","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000"], >>> xxxx >>> ["00f5", "07fdffff","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000"], >>> ["00f6", "00000000","fe000000","7fe30007","ffffe7fe","ffffffff","000c3fff","3001ce08","ffffff15"], >>> ["00f7", "00000000","83ff0052","00000000","07ffffff","00000000","81108102","00000000","ff7fffff"], >>> ["00fb", "0000001f","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000"], >>> ["00ff", "00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","00000000","10000000"]] >>> >>> Am I understanding this right please? >>> I'm trying to generate a glyph for all those present. >>> >>> My formatter says no such character where (I think) this map says there is one. >>> E.g. E059 >>> Row e0 >>> Group 3 (e040-e05f) >>> character 6 (numbering 0..7) >>> which is the 7. >>> On which basis (my understanding) >>> EO58 - >>> EO59 present >>> EO5A present >>> EO5B present >>> >>> Am I interpreting this correctly please? >>> >>> TIA >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Dave Pawson >>> XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. >>> Docbook FAQ. >>> http://www.dpawson.co.uk >> >> >> >> -- >> Dave Pawson >> XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. >> Docbook FAQ. >> http://www.dpawson.co.uk >> _______________________________________________ >> Fontconfig mailing list >> Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig > > > > -- > Akira TAGOH > _______________________________________________ > Fontconfig mailing list > Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk _______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
