Hi Brandon, Looks like someone went on to implement a design based on what you were after https://github.com/xahmad/fio/commit/c45abdaa857bd30ccf4f20ed59340686fc3e9103 . It's not in mainline fio but perhaps if it was cleaned up it could be submitted for inclusion? On 4 February 2017 at 07:37, Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I can't think of anything if you mean "I want the same thread/single > job to send both normal AND high priority commands" so perhaps it > would have to be done as new patch to the pvsync2 ioengine... > > On 4 February 2017 at 00:03, Brandon Schwartz <schwartz.xn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Thanks for the info, I'll play around with that option and see if I >> can make that work. Is there anything that would allow me to control >> the amount of priority commands from within a single thread? >> >> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Perhaps you could use multiple threads and utilise the flow >>> (http://fio.readthedocs.io/en/sphinx-doc/fio_doc.html#cmdoption-arg-flow >>> ) control on pairs of threads? >>> >>> On 2 February 2017 at 22:29, Brandon Schwartz <schwartz.xn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> 60% RandomRead / 40% RandomWrite but of those reads, have 15% be high priority >>>> >>>> Or is there a way to get this sort of priority testing done with >>>> current FIO? -- Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
