On 6 April 2017 at 22:13, GV Govindasamy <gv.govindasamy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks Sitsofe. After removing “rate_process=poisson” and giving “rate=<in-bytes>”, I can see the IOPS I have calculated for. In this case, 90 read ops and 10 write ops. > > “rate_process=poisson” is a bug in this case then? I'd say so because I'd have expected each I/O direction to have poisson applied to it independently of other I/O directions IF it has a differing submission rate to other I/O directions. Without doing this I'm unsure how the rates achieved could be independent of each other. -- Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html