Re: FIO does 2x IOPS with 'bssplit' option and 'rw=randwrite or rw=randread'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yes, thanks Sitsofe. Manual calculation of the size in bytes as input to “rate” helps.

Thanks
+GV

On 4/6/17, 4:17 PM, "Sitsofe Wheeler" <sitsofe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

    HI,
    
    On 6 April 2017 at 17:46, GV Govindasamy <gv.govindasamy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    > Thank you, Yes. when I remove “rate_process=poisson”, the IOPS are down to about 85% - 90%.
    >
    > I checked with rate_iops=100 and rate_iops=1000. In both cases, I got 85%-90% of rate_iops given.
    >
    > How do I accomplish 100% of IOPS?
    
    >     > [db-oltp-w]
    >     > bssplit=8k/90:16k/10,,
    >     > size=128G
    >     > filename=/dev/sdg
    >     > rw=randread
    >     > iodepth=8
    >     > rate_iops=100
    
    It seems to be a quirk of using bsplit with rate_iops. If the
    difference between the bsplit sizes is larger then the drop in the
    iops achieved will be even higher...
    
    -- 
    Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/
    

��.n��������+%������w��{.n�������^n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux