Re: NCQ Priority Support and FIO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for the info, I'll play around with that option and see if I
can make that work.  Is there anything that would allow me to control
the amount of priority commands from within a single thread?

Regards,
Brandon

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Perhaps you could use multiple threads and utilise the flow
> (http://fio.readthedocs.io/en/sphinx-doc/fio_doc.html#cmdoption-arg-flow
> ) control on pairs of threads?
>
> On 2 February 2017 at 22:29, Brandon Schwartz <schwartz.xn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> 60% RandomRead / 40% RandomWrite but of those reads, have 15% be high priority
>>
>> Or is there a way to get this sort of priority testing done with
>> current FIO?
>
> --
> Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux