Re: xen-unstable => 3.2, binary packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: xen-unstable => 3.2, binary packages
From: Robin Bowes <robin-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:59:27 +0000
In-reply-to: <18269.14554.836384.714726@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <18269.10903.495456.360011@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <475D2C86.7050401@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <18269.12955.151851.455070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20071210124721.GC15951@xxxxxxxxxx> <18269.14554.836384.714726@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115)

You might also like to read Daniel Berrange's post from 30th November
entitled "FYI: The plan for Xen kernels in Fedora 9"

R.

--
Fedora-xen mailing list
Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: xen-unstable => 3.2, binary packages
  - From: Ian Jackson

References:
- xen-unstable => 3.2, binary packages
  - From: Ian Jackson
- Re: xen-unstable => 3.2, binary packages
  - From: John Summerfield
- Re: xen-unstable => 3.2, binary packages
  - From: Ian Jackson
- Re: xen-unstable => 3.2, binary packages
  - From: Daniel Veillard
- Re: xen-unstable => 3.2, binary packages
  - From: Ian Jackson

Prev by Date: RE: (no subject) - (Win HVM not booting)
Next by Date: Re: xen-unstable => 3.2, binary packages
Previous by thread: Re: xen-unstable => 3.2, binary packages
Next by thread: Re: Re: xen-unstable => 3.2, binary packages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora General] [Fedora Music] [Linux Kernel] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora Directory] [PAM] [Big List of Linux Books] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux