Ian Jackson wrote:
We hope to be releasing upstream Xen 3.2 soon. As you'll know, we've
been in the habit of producing binary packages for our releases,
including for Fedora.
It seemed to me that the best approach would be, where possible, to
use a distro's own packaging setup. That would be more likely to
generate packages which integrate well with the distro and behave more
like the distro's own Xen packaging arrangements.
I haven't looked at the FC6 srpm in detail yet but what would you
think about it if we were to generate our 3.2 binary rpms based on
that ?
I wouldn't be impressed:-)
I believe FC6 has just been terminated (support for Fedora ends soon
after the second successor).
Is basing on Fedora 8 a problem? It's got about a year of life left in it.
Note to Ian
I assume that since you seem to have set reply to your own address that
you want off-list replies. You cannot reply direct to me however.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
You cannot reply off-list:-)
--
Fedora-xen mailing list
Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen
