On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 12:35:39PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> John Summerfield writes ("Re: xen-unstable => 3.2, binary packages"):
> > I believe FC6 has just been terminated (support for Fedora ends soon
> > after the second successor).
>
> Maybe I'm confused about version numbers or looking at the wrong
> sites. I'm pretty new to the fedora world so I hope you'll forgive me
> needing a bit of handholding.
>
> The sources I found were at
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/test/
> where the most recent are 6 and 6.93 (which I take to be a
> work-in-progress 7).
'Fedora Core' was renamed 'Fedora' between version 6 and 7, you
will find the latests under the 'releases' subdir:
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/releases/
Please rebase based on Fedora 8 if you a binary rebuild, thanks, but ...
My own opinion about this is that since xen is packaged as part of
Fedora, rebuilding a package on your side might be more of a problem
than a solution (I mean for official release rather than for testing)
since it's best to keep a coherency. If you have some problems with
the packages as done in Fedora, it's better to get the issues (assuming
any) solved, rather than putting a parallel set of packages, in the end
avoiding users confusions helps everybody in my opinion.
my 2 euros cents,
Daniel
--
Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
veillard@xxxxxxxxxx | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
--
Fedora-xen mailing list
Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen
