On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 12:26 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 14:22 -0400, James Laska wrote: > > > Tom's comment in another email makes me wonder if we want to keep this > > criteria, but rephrase. I agree with Matthias' thoughts on having items > > show up in multiple categories. Perhaps it can be reworded such that we > > would capture any cases where an application is duplicated (due to a > > broken .desktop entry). For example, if I activate the overview and > > type "terminal" ... if two identical entries show up matching > > "Terminal" ... someone needs to fix their .desktop, right? > > Not actually a good example, as they're not the same thing: one is > gnome-terminal and one is Terminal (not konsole, as Tom wrote) - the > default Xfce terminal emulator. Launch them both and hit Help / About > and you'll see. It would be nice to fix that particular situation > somehow, but it's not an example for the above :) > > I do agree that may be a good way to look at it, though. Do note the > word 'unintentionally' in the current criterion; that was put there > specifically to allow us to except cases where the duplication is > desired. Yeah you got it ... my example was theoretical, not specific to any actual current failure. Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
