On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/25/2011 04:11 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> this exact reason. Another classic example of this is updates to >> openoffice. There have been 10 updates @ 200Mb odd MB each for oo.o >> since the release of F-14 for such critical bugs as "background isn't >> transparent" [1] surely these could be bundled together once a month >> or so (I thought there was suppose to be a policy about this but I >> can't find it). > > There isn't any such policy suggesting or requiring bundling of bug > fixes and trying to mandate it via policy doesn't really seem > feasible. We could talk to the maintainers in question and understand > what happened first before trying to stop it. If it isn't a one off > problem, then it makes sense to discuss it in the broader context. The number of updates in a stable release has been discussed, at length. There was even discussion of implementing a policy for it but it clearly was never done. Peter -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
