Am Sonntag, den 23.01.2011, 20:01 +0100 schrieb drago01: > On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Christoph Wickert > <christoph.wickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 23.01.2011, 22:42 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: > >> On 01/23/2011 09:58 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > >> > > >> > Also keep in mind that there are other "first-class desktop > >> > environment". Moblin is just as much a GNOME based first-class desktop > >> > environment as gnome-shell, just for a different use-case (Netbooks). > >> > >> I don't think that's the case. GNOME Shell is a integral part of GNOME > >> 3. Moblin upstream seems only interested in being a complete OS and > >> haven't cooperated well with other projects which want to include Moblin > >> as a alternative UI in their distributions. Conman, trademark > >> shenanigans etc. I understand the point you are trying to make but > >> Moblin is really a poor example to pick. > > > > I agree it's a poor example and Ubuntu's Unity is yet another one > > because they don't cooperate well ether. Nevertheless all these are user > > interfaces based on GNOME technology. They are not default and seriously > > shouldn't be > > gnome-shell *is* the default gnome user interface starting with gnome3. I didn't claim something different. I said that *Unity and Moblin* are not default, but regardless of what is default, we shouldn't force users to install something they ether don't want to use or cannot even use. Regards, Christoph -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
