On 12/13/2010 04:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 15:43 -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: > >>> what does everyone think, particularly of the naming and the >>> categorization? I don't quite feel that this one's nailed down yet, if >>> anyone has smart ideas that'd be great. thanks. >>> >> Seems straightforward. I assume it doesn't make any difference if >> bios raid devices are being used as well as mdadm created devices. > > actually, it does. Most BIOS RAID devices aren't handled by mdadm (only > recent Intel BIOS RAID devices are), and there are different codepaths > there, so theoretically, software RAID and Intel BIOS RAID could be in > different states - one working and the other broken. The Grand Plan > would be to have separate test cases for each. > > But the content of this specific test case isn't really the important > thing here, it's just an example to give a feel for how the whole > critpath test case setup will look. I threw it together in half an hour > or so, it wasn't carefully worked out (or, well, tested :>) Well, I have both setups on two different machines and mdadm works ok on both AFAICT. Willing to test both!! Regards, OldFart -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
