On 12/13/2010 01:28 PM, Fedora QA wrote: > #154: Tracker: critical path test case creation > --------------------------+------------------------------------------------- > Reporter: adamwill | Owner: adamwill > Type: enhancement | Status: new > Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 15 > Component: Wiki | Version: > Resolution: | Keywords: > --------------------------+------------------------------------------------- > Comment (by adamwill): > > here's a draft of a sample test case, for mdadm: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_testcase_mdadm_package_software > > the production name would be QA:Testcase_mdadm_package_software , with > QA:Testcase being our standard prefix for test cases (it's not up for > debate within the context of this ticket, if we change it we must change > it for all test cases), then 'mdadm' being the source package name, > 'package' indicating this (that it's named based on a src.rpm name - > perhaps it should come before the name rather than after?), and 'software' > being the name of this particular test (referring to software RAID). > > what does everyone think, particularly of the naming and the > categorization? I don't quite feel that this one's nailed down yet, if > anyone has smart ideas that'd be great. thanks. > Seems straightforward. I assume it doesn't make any difference if bios raid devices are being used as well as mdadm created devices. Regards, OldFart -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
