Re: [Fedora QA] #154: Tracker: critical path test case creation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 15:43 -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:

> >   what does everyone think, particularly of the naming and the
> >   categorization? I don't quite feel that this one's nailed down yet, if
> >   anyone has smart ideas that'd be great. thanks.
> >
>   Seems straightforward.  I assume it doesn't make any difference if 
> bios raid devices are being used as well as mdadm created devices.

actually, it does. Most BIOS RAID devices aren't handled by mdadm (only
recent Intel BIOS RAID devices are), and there are different codepaths
there, so theoretically, software RAID and Intel BIOS RAID could be in
different states - one working and the other broken. The Grand Plan
would be to have separate test cases for each.

But the content of this specific test case isn't really the important
thing here, it's just an example to give a feel for how the whole
critpath test case setup will look. I threw it together in half an hour
or so, it wasn't carefully worked out (or, well, tested :>)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux