On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 13:56 +0000, "JÃhann B. GuÃmundsson" wrote: > On 12/06/2010 01:16 PM, James Laska wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 00:42 +0000, "JÃhann B. GuÃmundsson" wrote: > >> On 12/05/2010 12:06 AM, Brendan Jones wrote: > >>> Is it really so bad? > >> Yes and reporters should be able to opt out from this process chooses > >> they do so. > > They can. Turn off email notification for your bugzilla account, or > > disable notification related to flags. > > > > ? > > James care to explain to me how does me stop receiving notification > about my bugs opt out from the bugzapper process? > > I dont mind receiving notification about my reports what I mind is any > kind of bugzapping handling on my bugs like setting them to needinfo > status etc.. I didn't say it was a good solution. I understand frustration with email churn during EOL release time, but I'm not really sure it's a problem. From what I've observed, the EOL email reminders serve their purpose. Hey, you're bug is about to be closed ... if this is important/critical, now is the time to act. The alternative is silently closing EOL'd bugs. I don't think silently closing bugs works well with the principle of least surprise. Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
