On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 02:14 +0000, "JÃhann B. GuÃmundsson" wrote: > Can someone from the bugzapper team please explain to me why reporters > are being flagged with needinfo on their abrt filed report before their > bugs are EOL'ed without the maintainer actually requesting any needinfo > from the reporters? When we do the 'watch out, F12 is about to go EOL' notifications we set the bugs to needinfo <reporter> to flag up that if the reporter doesn't take any action, it'll probably get closed soon. This is always communicated in advance and John always asks for feedback before doing it. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora14#Fedora_12_EOL_Warning: "Actions to take on all bugs selected in query above: Add comment Set bug to NEEDINFO Reporter " > Ye must realize that maintainers will shit all over reporters claiming > that they do not respond reports and what not by doing what the > bugzapper script or abrt is doing. There's no particular special case for abrt here. F12 is EOL. Doesn't matter if the bug was manually or automatically reported, if we don't know it also happens in a supported release, there's no point keeping it open. The exact same policy and process has been followed for multiple releases now, it shouldn't be a surprise to anyone. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test