Re: no modue named yum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





2010/10/30 Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx>
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 12:07 +0300, cornel panceac wrote:
>
>
>
> yes, that was it:
>
> yum-3.2.28-4.fc13
>
> however, yum could have figured that putting a fc14 package over a
> fc13 one is  happening for one and only one reason ....

Trying to make yum 'smart' to deal with this kind of packaging problem
is a really bad idea and would just lead to other stuff breaking in
weird fashion, most likely. The correct fix is to not push updates like
this, which will be sorted by AutoQA in future.

This has been dealt with, now - a yum-3.2.28-5 has been pushed to f13
and f14 which makes sure that the f14 package is versioned higher than
f12's and f13's, so f12-f14 and f13-f14 upgrades should be okay now (as
far as *this* problem is concerned), once the problem with updates not
actually showing up in the updates repo is solved.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

this is good news, thank you very much. btw, is there a newer install dvd than rc1? 
-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux