On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 12:07 +0300, cornel panceac wrote: > > > 2010/10/29 cornel panceac <cpanceac@xxxxxxxxx> > > > 2010/10/29 cornel panceac <cpanceac@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > 2010/10/29 Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 01:20, cornel panceac > <cpanceac@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Doubtful. What is the version of yum on the > system and what is it on the DVD > > rpm -qa | grep yum > > > > yum-3.2.28-3.fc14 > on the dvd, and i'll try to discover what _was_ on the system > since it's been replaced by rpm --oldpackage . > > > > yes, that was it: > > yum-3.2.28-4.fc13 > > however, yum could have figured that putting a fc14 package over a > fc13 one is happening for one and only one reason .... Trying to make yum 'smart' to deal with this kind of packaging problem is a really bad idea and would just lead to other stuff breaking in weird fashion, most likely. The correct fix is to not push updates like this, which will be sorted by AutoQA in future. This has been dealt with, now - a yum-3.2.28-5 has been pushed to f13 and f14 which makes sure that the f14 package is versioned higher than f12's and f13's, so f12-f14 and f13-f14 upgrades should be okay now (as far as *this* problem is concerned), once the problem with updates not actually showing up in the updates repo is solved. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
