On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:17 PM, James Laska <jlaska@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 15:08 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 15:41:27 -0400, >> James Laska <jlaska@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 16:35 -0300, iarly selbir wrote: >> > > AFAIK, this group isn't used by the real QA members, instead we have >> > > both triagers, fedorabugs and proventesters for testers purposes. >> > >> > That's correct. Iarly lists the actively managed Fedora QA FAS groups. >> > Any other groups are ignored / not used. >> >> Is there some reason to keep that group? > > I can't think of one right now, other than the possibility that at some > point we may have a need for process/access the is restricted to a > subset of QA members. But as it stands now, there aren't any secret QA > process or tools that require special group membership. > > Perhaps it would make sense to change the group to be invite only, and > update the group description to note this is not an actively managed > group? > > Thanks, > James > > -- > test mailing list > test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test > +1 as someone how has applied for that group in the past only to find out no riding lessons, no pony. tk009 -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
