Re: Release criteria proposal: release notes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 21:39 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 16:15:46 -0700,
>   Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > 
> > Actually there are switches that need to be thrown, to point the repos
> > to the right place.  Also we need to make sure that any modifications
> > made to the kickstart scripts used to produce the release are actually
> > put into the package and bundled with the release.  The
> > fedora-install-fedora kickstart also comes from the same package, so we
> > can't /just/ rely on the desktop criteria.
> 
> The switches have been throw in the version currently in updates-testing.
> That isn't the final version as we are still reacting to the wall paper
> landing. There was a commit to the repo today for broffice.org. I'll do
> another build after everything is fixed, but it may be better to let that
> version of the package go out as an update.

in this thread we're just talking about the wording of release criteria,
not any practical work relating to F14 - just so that's clear :)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux