On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 15:36 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/18/2010 09:58 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Proposed Final release criterion: > > > > The final release notes from the Documentation team must be present in > > the release repository in packaged form > > We need the same for final versions of artwork ( may cover fedora-logos, > <releasename>-backgrounds, maybe more? ), Already covered, we added artwork criteria earlier this cycle. > final version of > spin-kickstarts package I don't think this *in itself* is a criteria issue, in that whatever the final spin-kickstarts package turns out to be is fairly arbitrary, right? There aren't specific requirements for the package itself as there are for the release-notes and fedora-release packages, AFAIK, there isn't some specific switch in the package that has to be flipped to 'release' state. So I think it's better to stick with the desktop criteria here - any need to change spin-kickstarts should stem from a breakage of the desktop criteria. > , and the final version of fedora-release. agreed, proposed criterion: A fedora-release package and a generic-release package appropriately versioned and containing the correct names and information for a final Fedora release (as opposed to a pre-release) must be present in the release repository. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
