Re: heads-up: upstart reversion coming soon

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/15/2010 03:35 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:

> I think we all realize that the timing was exceedingly bad on this.
> I think we should try to distill some lessons from this for how we
> approach 'invasive' features in the future.

If the vore was as close as it was in this case, it begs the question of 
a proper cost analysis. How much extra burden is now generated in 
ripping systemd out compared to fixing the known/open bugs?

We definitely lose a key component here and the "reward" is seemingly a 
lot of extra work on the QA process and participants. It's something 
that should never happen again. We all learn as we go, but given the 
collected wisdom of our community, it surprises me that we came to this 
decision this late in the release cycle.

Jan

-- 
Jan H Wildeboer                |
EMEA Open Source Affairs       | Office: +49 (0)89 205071-207
Red Hat GmbH                   | Mobile: +49 (0)174 33 23 249
Technopark II, Haus C          | Fax:    +49 (0)89 205071-111
Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 11 -15 |
85630 Grasbrunn                |
_____________________________________________________________________

Reg. Adresse: Red Hat GmbH,
Technopark II, Haus C, Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 11 -15
85630 Grasbrunn, Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 153243
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Brendan Lane, Charlie Peters, Michael Cunningham,
Charles Cachera
_____________________________________________________________________

GPG Key:     3AC3C8AB
Fingerprint: 3D1E C4E0 DD67 E16D E47A  9564 A72F 5C39 3AC3 C8AB
-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux