On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 23:22 -0500, Jeff Raber wrote: > On 06/18/2010 01:15 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I want to keep to the 'Test Day' because the concurrency aspect - having > > everyone in IRC, including a developer to give a very fast feedback/fix > > loop - is one of the key features, and you can't maintain that over a > > period longer than a day. > > > > However, I do agree in one way: we can certainly make use of testing > > done outside of the exact 'day', and we should make sure to always > > communicate that. I try to do so when talking about Test Days and when > > making pages for them, but any ways we can be even more explicit about > > this would be great:) > > My thoughts: Thanks for the feedback, Jeff! > 1. The "Arriving after the date above?" admon on [1] & [2] work well to > deliver the message about testing after the 'day'. Consider using this > same admon on future test day pages. Indeed. I should make sure it's in the template page, actually. Thanks. > 2. Consider adding something similar to the 'Fedora_$REL_test_days' [3] > and 'Test_Days' [4] pages. Also a good idea. > 3. Calling it a Test _Day_ sure makes it sound like it is limited to a > single 24hour period. Maybe this is a marketing problem, is there a > better name? If there is, I haven't been able to think of it :(. As I said, the problem is it cuts both ways; the 'day' concept has good connotations as well as bad ones. I haven't been able to come with anything that keeps the good while cutting the bad. Suggestions gratefully received! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test