On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 09:48 -0600, Adam Miller wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > <SNIP> > > "Fedora CURRENT_RELEASE+1" <-- the official name is Branched, you can > > just say 'Fedora Branched', and link to the Branched page - > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Branched . You can put a little > > explanation of what Branched is in brackets if you feel it necessary, I > > guess. > > > > Fixed in the wiki page. Actually, now I think about it, the group is intended to be used for stable releases too. Should we write it as if that's already in place? Something like: "The Proven Testers are a dedicated group of the Fedora Quality Assurance Community who work towards making sure updated Critical Path packages for stable Fedora releases and the upcoming stable release ('Branched') are not broken"? > > The line "The QA group within FAS will grant the ability to add karma > > inside of Bodhi to the Critical Path packages within Fedora > > CURRENT_RELEASE+1." seems out of place - is it an orphan? > > That verbage was a little off and has been clarified (at least in my > mind, but verification from others is welcome!) I think it should say 'ProvenTesters group', not 'QA group'. The point of the proventesters project is to fulfill this role (of giving 'weighted' feedback); the way Bodhi currently uses the QA and releng groups to do this is just a short-term bodge. When we put ProvenTesters in place, it will be members of that group whose feedback is weighted, not QA/releng members. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
