On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: <SNIP> > "Fedora CURRENT_RELEASE+1" <-- the official name is Branched, you can > just say 'Fedora Branched', and link to the Branched page - > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Branched . You can put a little > explanation of what Branched is in brackets if you feel it necessary, I > guess. > Fixed in the wiki page. > I think the way the page starts off with the 'what is Critical Path?' > question is a bit jarring. I'd start with 'What are Quality Assurance > Proven Testers?' and explain critical path either just by linking to the > page, or as a sub-note in that section, not give it its own section. > Agreed. It was just written that way because it was my flow of thought when I was calling the group "Critical Path Wranglers." I've edited to page to reflect this change. > On the other hand, I'd start a new section for "The following steps are > imperative to join the QA Proven Testers:". 'How to join' is different > from 'What it is', to me. The explanation of the group could be a bit > more extended, and there could be a bit more sell on why you'd want to > join up. > I added a little bit to the explanation of that what the FAS group is/does. Let me know what you think. > Step 3 is a bit worrying; it's a very vague 'roadblock' (how do I know > when I'm sufficiently 'involved' to move on to step 4?) I'd probably > ditch step 3 and go straight to step 4. If we're requiring mentoring, > the mentor can always act as a filter for someone who's just joined and > doesn't have a clue what they're doing, and suggest they do some more > 'appropriate' activities before becoming a proven tester. > Step 3 is now removed > I wouldn't have "ProvenTesters FAS Group" as a separate section. It can > just flow on from the above text, if it's part of a 'How to join' > section. merged into the "how to join" section > > The line "The QA group within FAS will grant the ability to add karma > inside of Bodhi to the Critical Path packages within Fedora > CURRENT_RELEASE+1." seems out of place - is it an orphan? That verbage was a little off and has been clarified (at least in my mind, but verification from others is welcome!) > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org > http://www.happyassassin.net > > -- > test mailing list > test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test > Current draft available at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/JoinProvenTesters:Draft All feedback welcome, thanks for the review! -AdamM -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com --------------------------------------------------------- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
