On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 10:12 -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > Hello all testers out there! > > I somehow got it in my mind that we were calling the ProvenTesters > group ProvenPackagers even though I new good and well that such a FAS > group already exists and is overseen by FESCo. So here we are with > round 2 and a correct naming structure. I apologize for any confusion > I might have caused. > > Original email here: > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-March/089752.html > New wiki page here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/JoinProvenTesters:Draft > > Questions, Comments and Snide Remarks are all welcome! "Fedora CURRENT_RELEASE+1" <-- the official name is Branched, you can just say 'Fedora Branched', and link to the Branched page - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Branched . You can put a little explanation of what Branched is in brackets if you feel it necessary, I guess. I think the way the page starts off with the 'what is Critical Path?' question is a bit jarring. I'd start with 'What are Quality Assurance Proven Testers?' and explain critical path either just by linking to the page, or as a sub-note in that section, not give it its own section. On the other hand, I'd start a new section for "The following steps are imperative to join the QA Proven Testers:". 'How to join' is different from 'What it is', to me. The explanation of the group could be a bit more extended, and there could be a bit more sell on why you'd want to join up. Step 3 is a bit worrying; it's a very vague 'roadblock' (how do I know when I'm sufficiently 'involved' to move on to step 4?) I'd probably ditch step 3 and go straight to step 4. If we're requiring mentoring, the mentor can always act as a filter for someone who's just joined and doesn't have a clue what they're doing, and suggest they do some more 'appropriate' activities before becoming a proven tester. I wouldn't have "ProvenTesters FAS Group" as a separate section. It can just flow on from the above text, if it's part of a 'How to join' section. The line "The QA group within FAS will grant the ability to add karma inside of Bodhi to the Critical Path packages within Fedora CURRENT_RELEASE+1." seems out of place - is it an orphan? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
