On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 12:42 -0400, Christopher Beland wrote: > It seems to me that critical path packages would benefit from non-Proven > Testers giving advisory feedback into the system, even if it isn't > automatically counted. The more people that do testing, the better, and > packagers can manually evaluate comments by new testers. It just seems > better to have those comments which may or may not influence the > decision, than to ignore potential feedback from people who actually > care enough to test and report back. This will be the case, the feedback from proventesters is just afforded higher value in Bodhi. Non-proventesters can still provide feedback. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
