----- "James Laska" <jlaska@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yeah, exactly. Very odd. The only way adding --newest would fail > and > not using --newest would work is if there were multiple kernel > packages > on the RC2 DVD media. If I'm reading the --help page correct, by default repoclosure should check *all* packages, and with --newest it should check *only newest* packages. Therefore if a broken dependency is detected with --newest and is not detected without it, I assume it should be reported as a bug in repoclosure. > > Should the test case [1] always use --newest since that seems to > more > closely mirror yum behavior during installation? I believe we should check all packages available, that means no --newest. Assuming it works correctly. The other question is - should we write/find another tool to detect duplicated packages on the install media and report an error if multiple versions of the same package are found there? Should that condition be always valid, or are there some exceptions? > > Thanks, > James > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_Repoclosure > -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
