On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 21:45 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:33:12 -0500, James wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > In bug#567706, Andre Robatino asked whether the test case > > QA:Testcase_Mediakit_Repoclosure [1] should have found the reported > > issue. I suspect it should have. > > > > While retesting, it appears that the following repoclosure command > > correctly identifies the missing dependency: > > > > $ repoclosure --repofrompath=media,/media -a x86_64 -r media -n > > Added media repo from /media > > Reading in repository metadata - please wait.... > > Checking Dependencies > > Repos looked at: 1 > > media > > Num Packages in Repos: 3256 > > package: > > 1:xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.16-0.20100205gite75dd23.fc13.x86_64 > > from media > > unresolved deps: > > kernel-drm-nouveau = 0:15 > > > > However, when run without the '-n' option, as documented in the test > > case [1], it does not detect bug#567706. > > > > repoclosure --repofrompath=media,/media -a x86_64 -r media > > Added media repo from /media > > Reading in repository metadata - please wait.... > > Checking Dependencies > > Repos looked at: 1 > > media > > Num Packages in Repos: 3261 > > > > Afaik, the packages on the mediakit should not contain multiple versions > > of a package, so I'm unclear why adding the -n|--newest flag captures > > the missing deps. > > > > Thanks, > > James > > > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_Repoclosure > > Did you notice the difference in the "Num Packages in Repos" line? > With -n there are five pkgs less than without -n. Yeah, exactly. Very odd. The only way adding --newest would fail and not using --newest would work is if there were multiple kernel packages on the RC2 DVD media. Sure enough ... -rw-r--r--. 2 root 101737 22268072 2010-02-20 16:24 /media/Packages/kernel-2.6.33-0.46.rc8.git1.fc13.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r--. 2 100351 101737 22185504 2010-02-22 23:01 /media/Packages/kernel-2.6.33-0.51.rc8.git6.fc13.x86_64.rpm Closer inspection shows .. $ rpm -qp --provides kernel-2.6.33-0.46.rc8.git1.fc13.x86_64.rpm | grep kernel-drm-nouveau kernel-drm-nouveau = 15 $ rpm -qp --provides kernel-2.6.33-0.51.rc8.git6.fc13.x86_64.rpm | grep kernel-drm-nouveau kernel-drm-nouveau = 16 Summary: by adding --newest, it chooses the .51 (newer) kernel above which does not satisfy the xorg-x11-drv-nouveau kernel-drm-nouveau = 0:15 dependency. I'm guessing kernel-2.6.33-0.46 was pulled into the DVD compose to satisfy dependencies of xorg-x11-drv-nouveau, otherwise it doesn't make sense to have two of the same kernel packages on the media (kernel and kernel-PAE are different). Should the test case [1] always use --newest since that seems to more closely mirror yum behavior during installation? Thanks, James [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_Repoclosure
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
