On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:33:12 -0500, James wrote: > Greetings, > > In bug#567706, Andre Robatino asked whether the test case > QA:Testcase_Mediakit_Repoclosure [1] should have found the reported > issue. I suspect it should have. > > While retesting, it appears that the following repoclosure command > correctly identifies the missing dependency: > > $ repoclosure --repofrompath=media,/media -a x86_64 -r media -n > Added media repo from /media > Reading in repository metadata - please wait.... > Checking Dependencies > Repos looked at: 1 > media > Num Packages in Repos: 3256 > package: > 1:xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.16-0.20100205gite75dd23.fc13.x86_64 > from media > unresolved deps: > kernel-drm-nouveau = 0:15 > > However, when run without the '-n' option, as documented in the test > case [1], it does not detect bug#567706. > > repoclosure --repofrompath=media,/media -a x86_64 -r media > Added media repo from /media > Reading in repository metadata - please wait.... > Checking Dependencies > Repos looked at: 1 > media > Num Packages in Repos: 3261 > > Afaik, the packages on the mediakit should not contain multiple versions > of a package, so I'm unclear why adding the -n|--newest flag captures > the missing deps. > > Thanks, > James > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_Repoclosure Did you notice the difference in the "Num Packages in Repos" line? With -n there are five pkgs less than without -n. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
