----- "Kamil Paral" <kparal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ----- "James Laska" <jlaska@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Yeah, exactly. Very odd. The only way adding --newest would fail > > and > > not using --newest would work is if there were multiple kernel > > packages > > on the RC2 DVD media. > > If I'm reading the --help page correct, by default repoclosure should > check *all* packages, and with --newest it should check *only newest* > packages. Therefore if a broken dependency is detected with --newest > and is not detected without it, I assume it should be reported as > a bug in repoclosure. Yay, forget about my previous post, I got it wrong. I had to try it myself to understand it. Now I get it - not only repoclosure checks just the newest packages for broken dependencies, also those *dependant packages* (the targets) must be amongst the newest ones. I wonder if it is intentional or not. > > > > > Should the test case [1] always use --newest since that seems to > > more > > closely mirror yum behavior during installation? > Well, yum is able to work around this problem, isn't it? It should just select an older kernel for installation. I tried to simulate it on my F12 machine by adding a repo, but I failed to be completely sure. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
