On Friday 29 of January 2010 23:57:39 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:53:52 -0600 > > Adam Miller <maxamillion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'd like to publicly, "on list", thank you for your efforts > > in keeping up with the reporting. It's extremely useful and > > much appreciated (though I get the feeling you don't hear > > that often if at all). > > Seconded. ;) Thanks for doing these. +1 > Would it be of help to have a wiki page to point people at? > Ie, a 'You got a broken dep email, what should you do now' > type of page? I guess it might help with the type 2 people to > explain why thats not likely the case for their package. good idea ... last time, I've wondered what can I do if I want to choose to ignore the broken dep intentionally, knowing that a rebuild of the affected package will be done soon anyways ... finally, after not having found relevant docs, before bothering asking someone I gave up and just rebuilt the package ... and the same package got rebuilt the very next day again because of other reason btw, IMHO it is counterproductive to put all those rebuilds into .spec changelogs - now it happens, if you have some easy package that doesn't change much but it requires a lot of libraries then you have to scroll down two pages of "rebuilt for this, rebuilt for that" messagess between real changes that really interest you, the rest is just noise K. -- Karel Volný QE BaseOs/Daemons Team Red Hat Czech, Brno tel. +420 532294274 (RH: +420 532294111 ext. 8262074) xmpp kavol@xxxxxxxxx :: "Never attribute to malice what can :: easily be explained by stupidity."
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
