On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Apparently, with regard to broken dependency notifications, there are > three types of package maintainers: > > (1) The I-do-not-care-and-give-a-s**t-about-the-reports type of maintainer, > who ignores the reports and possibly filters the private mails into Trash. > > (2) The blasphemy!-false-positives!-my-pkg-is-not-broken-wtf type of > maintainer, who either flames me immediately after receiving the first > report or after several weeks when the private mails still haven't > stopped. > > (3) The I-understand-the-problem-or-I-ask type of maintainer, who fixes a > broken dependency silently, or who asks for help, and who is easy to deal > with. > > Obviously, I prefer type (3). There is no need to spend any time on > sending acknowledgements about broken deps reports to me privately, > especially not if the Rawhide report has found the same broken deps. > But please think twice before having a whinge in a private reply and > accusing me of false positives. > -- > test mailing list > test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test > I'd like to publicly, "on list", thank you for your efforts in keeping up with the reporting. It's extremely useful and much appreciated (though I get the feeling you don't hear that often if at all). Many thanks, -AdamM -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com --------------------------------------------------------- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
