Le Ven 29 janvier 2010 17:59, David Malcolm a écrit : > > On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 15:45 +0000, Rawhide Report wrote: > > [snip] > > Looks like whatever generates this report is reordering items in the > changelog relative to the %changelog in the specfile, but in some > surprising ways; is this a known issue? > > Normally the items in a %changelog are in order most-recent through > least-recent. > > But in this report, see e.g. how 2.2-9 appears, then 2.2-10: >> audacious-2.2-10.fc13 >> --------------------- >> * Thu Jan 28 2010 Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 2.2-9 >> - Let set_tuple_cb() work on a copied tuple >> (the metadata updates flood is too racy IMO). >> - Fix tuple_copy(). >> >> * Thu Jan 28 2010 Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 2.2-10 >> - Fix tuple_copy() further (it was completely broken as the mowgli >> dict wasn't copied at all). This is one reason I prefer to use the following changelog style * Thu Jan 28 2010 Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 2.2-10 - Fix tuple_copy() further (it was completely broken as the mowgli dict wasn't copied at all). - 2.2-9 - Let set_tuple_cb() work on a copied tuple (the metadata updates flood is too racy IMO). - Fix tuple_copy(). -- Nicolas Mailhot -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
