On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 09:32 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 18:03 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > > ...or what weird third-party package may be preventing libmudflap-devel > > > from getting updated... > > > > Conspiracy theories are not helpful. There have been similarily "weird" > > packages in the Fedora package collection before, too. > > um. It's hardly a conspiracy theory, it's a common cause of this kind of > problem. I did consider mentioning that it can happen with repository > packages too, but didn't bother for brevity. Guess I won that battle but > lost the war...sigh. Quite right - it only becomes a Conspiracy Theory(TM) when people start pursuing it in spite of ample evidence to the contrary. Regards, Bryn. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
