On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:47:39 -0800, Adam wrote: > On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 11:42 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: > > > > You should see a newer gcc *and* libmudflag-devel in the repo. Check whether > > > you don't have any duplicates installed. Please confirm by doing a *little bit* > > > of homework. > > > > > > > and all that's going to do is confirm what the repo has - it's not going > > to confirm what he might have installed or exclude or worse yet what > > plugins he might be running. One needs to start trouble-shooting somewhere. Yum output does not show everything. A simple "rpm -q libmudflap-devel ; yum list libmudflap-devel" can be very helpful, considering that the "Yum update gcc" output actually showed the new gcc (and knowing that libmudflap is built from the same src.rpm). > ...or what weird third-party package may be preventing libmudflap-devel > from getting updated... Conspiracy theories are not helpful. There have been similarily "weird" packages in the Fedora package collection before, too. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
