On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 11:42 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
>
> > > You should see a newer gcc *and* libmudflag-devel in the repo.
> > > Check whether you don't have any duplicates installed. Please
> > > confirm by doing a *little bit* of homework.
> >
> > and all that's going to do is confirm what the repo has - it's not
> > going to confirm what he might have installed or exclude or worse
> > yet what plugins he might be running.
>
> ...or what weird third-party package may be preventing
> libmudflap-devel from getting updated...
as i mentioned in my earlier post, all i was trying to verify on
that first attempt was to ascertain whether or not what happened
*shouldn't* have happened. if it's truly a bug, then i'll BZ it. if
not, i'll forget about it. but if i do something as apparently
innocuous as "yum update gcc" and it blows up whining about
libmudflap-devel, that strikes me as something out of the ordinary and
unexpected.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
