On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 11:42 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
You should see a newer gcc *and* libmudflag-devel in the repo.
Check whether you don't have any duplicates installed. Please
confirm by doing a *little bit* of homework.
and all that's going to do is confirm what the repo has - it's not
going to confirm what he might have installed or exclude or worse
yet what plugins he might be running.
...or what weird third-party package may be preventing
libmudflap-devel from getting updated...
as i mentioned in my earlier post, all i was trying to verify on
that first attempt was to ascertain whether or not what happened
*shouldn't* have happened. if it's truly a bug, then i'll BZ it. if
not, i'll forget about it. but if i do something as apparently
innocuous as "yum update gcc" and it blows up whining about
libmudflap-devel, that strikes me as something out of the ordinary and
unexpected.
and that is precisely the problem.
We know you SAY you said 'yum update gcc' but there can be a lot more
details about what you're actually running and the configuration therein.
But you're removing a lot of relevant data.
-sv
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
