On 10/27/2009 11:18 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski (D.Mierzejewski@xxxxxxxxxx) said: >>> Here's the tickets that discussed the removal: >>> >>> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2712 >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523998 >>> >>> lam should probably be added back until the dependent programs can be >>> migrated to use OpenMPI. >> >> I notice that there isn't a word there about who will be responsible for >> fixing the packages which depend on LAM currently. You can't just remove >> a package without some sort of early warning and a plan to fix the >> fall-out. > > It has now been unblocked. Given the maintiner's original wish to have > it removed, I suspect it needs a new maintainer. I *can* maintain it, but you are correct in that I have no wish to. My apologies on the way this was handled, I honestly didn't expect anyone to still be using lam. It's been deprecated/dead upstream for so long that I expected all the dependent packages would have moved on by now. -- Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx> GPG KeyID: CFBFF194 http://people.redhat.com/dledford Infiniband specific RPMs available at http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
