Re: rawhide report: 20091027 changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski (D.Mierzejewski@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > Here's the tickets that discussed the removal:
> > 
> > https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2712
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523998
> > 
> > lam should probably be added back until the dependent programs can be
> > migrated to use OpenMPI.
> 
> I notice that there isn't a word there about who will be responsible for
> fixing the packages which depend on LAM currently. You can't just remove
> a package without some sort of early warning and a plan to fix the
> fall-out.

It has now been unblocked. Given the maintiner's original wish to have
it removed, I suspect it needs a new maintainer.

Bill

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux