On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 08:35:34AM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > <D.Mierzejewski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:11:10PM +0000, Rawhide Report wrote: > >> Compose started at Tue Oct 27 06:15:09 UTC 2009 > >> > >> Broken deps for i386 > >> ---------------------------------------------------------- > >> blacs-lam-1.1-33.fc12.i686 requires liblamf77mpi.so.0 > >> blacs-lam-1.1-33.fc12.i686 requires liblam.so.0 > >> orsa-lam-0.7.0-11.fc12.i686 requires lam > >> scalapack-lam-1.7.5-7.fc12.i686 requires liblam.so.0 > >> scalapack-lam-1.7.5-7.fc12.i686 requires liblamf77mpi.so.0 > >> tachyon-lam-0.98.7-1.fc12.i686 requires liblam.so.0 > >> tachyon-lam-0.98.7-1.fc12.i686 requires liblamf77mpi.so.0 > >> tachyon-lam-gl-0.98.7-1.fc12.i686 requires liblam.so.0 > >> tachyon-lam-gl-0.98.7-1.fc12.i686 requires liblamf77mpi.so.0 > > > >> Removed package lam > > > > Huh what? WTH are you thinking removing a package when we're in Beta > > freeze? > > Here's the tickets that discussed the removal: > > https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2712 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523998 > > lam should probably be added back until the dependent programs can be > migrated to use OpenMPI. I notice that there isn't a word there about who will be responsible for fixing the packages which depend on LAM currently. You can't just remove a package without some sort of early warning and a plan to fix the fall-out. Regards, R. -- Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rathann*at*icm.edu.pl> | LAN Staff Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modelling University of Warsaw | http://www.icm.edu.pl | tel. +48 22 5540810 -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
