On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:23:34 -0700, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Kamil noted explicitly that anaconda _dependencies_ are often broken, > which is usually not the fault of anaconda. > > anaconda is developed just as any other Fedora component is. Anaconda is considered a critical package and I believe that also makes it dependencies critical packages. Eventually these packages are all supposed to be handled more carefully so that rawhide is very likely to be installable, bootable and updatable at any point in time. There was also a separate initiative to make the last know good rawhide available when rawhide does have critical breakage. That proposal doesn't seem to have been implemented as described, but may be going on in some form. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Critical_Path_Packages_Proposal https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Israwhidebroken.com_Proposal -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
