On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 17:04 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > I think Anaconda should stay we need to expose the installer to as > much > testing as possible ( AutoQA should be able to take care of kickstarts > installation testing but that certainly leaves the GUI one out which > the > regular end users is exposed to ) and frankly I think the problem lies > elsewhere I sometimes have a gut feeling that Team anaconda is not > quite > following the same rules and regulation as the rest of the community. Kamil noted explicitly that anaconda _dependencies_ are often broken, which is usually not the fault of anaconda. anaconda is developed just as any other Fedora component is. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
