On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:13:28PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 07:07 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote: > > However, as Rawhide is alpha/beta--I would think that it would be full > > of debugging code that would slow it down, making it a poor choice for > > comparision testing. > > What debugging code are we talking about here ? I don't know. That's why I said "I would think." :) I do know that at times, I've had issues that I've posted here, and been given an rpm of say, a kernel that had debugging code removed which then worked. Sorry if it came off as knowledge, rather than a question, I blame it on the early hour. Rereading my message, I see it was phrased poorly. Thanks for pointing that out. Let me rephrase it. I know that in many alpha/beta releases of Linux and other distributions, performance is slowed by a great deal of debugging code? Is that the case in Rawhide? -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 Spike: Should I really trust you? Adam: Scout's honor. Spike: You were a Boy Scout? Adam: Parts of me. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
