On 07/28/2009 08:13 AM, Adam Pribyl wrote: <snip> Removed mentioning of phoronix and their extraordinaire benchmarking techniques... </snip> > Therefore I think, this kind of tests should become at least a part of > QA procedure for a release, to make sure we do not loose too much > while beeing "first". > You cannot reliably "benchmark" rawhide performance nor should we even try. Identifying and fixing bugs comes first, *tuning* comes later. However actively monitor supported release performance and improving it sounds more a likely candidate but you will need to contact infrastructure to see if they have resources to spare etc.. JBG
begin:vcard fn:Johann B. Gudmundsson n:Gudmundsson;Johann B. org:Reiknistofnun - University of Iceland;IT Management adr:Taeknigardi;;Dunhagi 5;Reykjavik;;107;Iceland email;internet:johannbg@xxxxx title:Unix System Engineer RHCE,CCSA tel;work:+3545254267 tel;fax:+3545528801 tel;pager:N/A tel;home:N/A tel;cell:N/A url:www.rhi.hi.is version:2.1 end:vcard
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
