On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 16:03 -0400, Christopher Beland wrote: > On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 11:50 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > If, say, I'd seen an issue reported > > twice but not yet with sufficient info, I might set it to CONFIRMED, but > > it's not yet been triaged. > > What would have to happen is that the person setting "CONFIRMED" would > mark the other bugs as duplicates, do whatever small remaining triage > work there is to do, request the missing info and set the bug to > CONFIRMED+NEEDINFO. > > This violates the "it's not finished being triaged if it's missing info > from the reporter" rule, but I never really liked that rule, anyway. 8) Unless you're setting the new Triaged flag, I don't see how it violates that rule. But we're getting ahead of ourselves, we haven't even decided what changes we want to *ask* for yet. We should probably discuss this at the next meeting. Bugs without sufficient information have not been triaged. Ensuring sufficient information is present in the report is one of the most important parts of triage. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
