On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 09:06 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 16:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > And it's also just semantically wrong - the word 'assigned' > > does not mean 'triaged'. > > It can also be a bit annoying when there are multiple maintainers for a > package, and it gets "assigned" to the main maintainer. Personally I'd > prefer e.g. renaming "new" to "unconfirmed", and "assigned" to > "confirmed". That doesn't work either, though, for the same objection - it's not 'confirmed', it's triaged. We don't require reproduction as part of the triage process. I think the only sensible way to rename the states would be NEW and TRIAGED, but I'd rather have a keyword for Triaged than have it be a state, personally. > Whether or not an additional state of "assigned" is then > necessary is fair moot to me. I'd prefer to avoid flag-city with an > explosion of possible flag-combinations, and have a simple state > pipeline. Yep, me too. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
