On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 07:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 09:06 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 16:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > And it's also just semantically wrong - the word 'assigned' > > > does not mean 'triaged'. > > > > It can also be a bit annoying when there are multiple maintainers for a > > package, and it gets "assigned" to the main maintainer. Personally I'd > > prefer e.g. renaming "new" to "unconfirmed", and "assigned" to > > "confirmed". > > That doesn't work either, though, for the same objection - it's not > 'confirmed', it's triaged. We don't require reproduction as part of the > triage process. Well, now I think about it, we could have UNCONFIRMED and CONFIRMED, and a 'Triaged' flag, as those two definitions are different; you can have a bug that's been confirmed but not triaged, and vice versa. And that may actually be useful information. Yay, complications! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
