Re: Bugzilla semantics: marking bugs as triaged

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 14:17 -0500, Allen Kistler wrote:

> > As noted in earlier discussion in this thread, no, that's not how it
> > works currently. ASSIGNED is set by the triager, not the maintainer, so
> > it doesn't indicate anything about the maintainer's intentions, strictly
> > speaking.
> 
> I think you misunderstood.  I wasn't talking about how Fedora personnel 
> set the fields.  I was talking about how Bugzilla, the software, 
> interprets and represents the fields,

OK.

>  based mostly, I'm sure, on how RH 
> uses them for RHEL.

Why would that be? Bugzilla comes from Mozilla, originally, not RHEL.
The descriptions you cite come from upstream Bugzilla, I believe, not
from Red Hat. The RHEL workflow, FWIW, is the same as Fedora's in this
respect; ASSIGNED is set when triage is complete.

> The challenge is that if Fedora is going to start using them too 
> differently from RHEL, then perhaps Bugzilla needs a "My Fedora Front 
> Page" in addition to "My Front Page."

We don't want to make extensive customizations to Bugzilla. The
canonical reference for the Fedora bug workflow is
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow .

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux